Gender Danger: The Case against Case Exhibit A

Family Matters in Hawai’i

If you are of the mind that your wife, your daughter, your granddaughter should not be subjected to sharing a bathroom, locker room, or shower room that falls under public accommodations and facilities with a individual who decides ‘He” is a “Woman” you need to consider the following:

Ed Case voted FOR H.R.5-117th Congress (2021-2022)
The Bill states: This bill prohibits discrimination based on sex, sexual orientation, and gender identity in areas including public accommodations and facilities, education, federal funding, employment, housing, credit, and the jury system. Specifically, the bill defines and includes sex, sexual orientation, and gender identity among the prohibited categories of discrimination or segregation.

The bill expands the definition of public accommodations to include places or establishments that provide (1) exhibitions, recreation, exercise, amusement, gatherings, or displays; (2) goods, services, or programs; and (3) transportation services.

The bill allows the Department of Justice to intervene in equal protection actions in federal court on account of sexual orientation or gender identity.

The bill prohibits an individual from being denied access to a shared facility, including a restroom, a locker room, and a dressing room, that is in accordance with the individual’s gender identity.

Link to Conrad’s comments on the matter:  


Link the Actual Bill:

Link to the Cosponsors:

Any decent human being recognizes that kindness, respect and acknowledgement of the other person is highly valued in working Societies. That being said, twisting that concept into areas that end up being harmful for all concerned is no longer kindness.

Q: Is it kind and respectful to allow our young children to be subjected to encroachment into public showering facilities by adult male individuals with ill-intent? 

This is clearly not the true meaning of “Aloha” no matter who says otherwise.  

If you think this is an exaggeration, then please review this story:

Sports Matters in Hawai’i

Ed Case voted AGAINST H.R.426-117th Congress (2021-2022)

This bill makes it a violation of federal law for a recipient of federal funds who operates, sponsors, or facilitates athletic programs or activities to permit a person whose sex is male to participate in an athletic program or activity that is designated for women or girls.

The bill specifies that sex shall be recognized based solely on a person’s reproductive biology and genetics at birth.  

So it’s clear: Ed Case OPPOSES protecting Girls and Women in competitive Sports situations.
When questioned about this by a concerned citizen, here was Ed’s Response:


Link the Actual Bill:
He specifically states he is supporting Biden’s agenda (Executive Order 13988) as a priority as opposed to the concerned people of Hawai’i.

Link to Response Letter:

Link to the Bill:

Ed case proudly accepted the what was referred to as the Transgender Flag, stating he was “Deeply Honored” to do so.

Title 9 Considerations 
No person in the United States shall, on the basis of sex, be excluded from participation in, be denied benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any educational program or activity receiving federal financial assistance.”

Beyond Public Safety, have you considered what this will do to Sports activities here is Hawai’i?

Do you believe it’s a good idea to allow what can rationally be considered a Male to compete and dominate your daughters in what was a Women’s Sport Division?  

Ed Case has consistently voted to erase the clear, rational lines between Male and Female

Download the Exhibit
Exhibit A

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *